College spirit like Locker's is why we love this game
by Don Borst, Special to FOXSports.com
If not for these manful men in stripes patrolling the field Saturday in Seattle, we might have lost control of this game ... this sport ... this way of life. Or something.
Here's what happened at the end of the game between Washington and No. 15 BYU: On the last play, Locker scampered into the end zone to score the apparent game-tying touchdown. This for a team that has lost not only 11 of its last 13 games, but its last 19 games against opponents ranked 20th or higher. And as he leaped to his feet, Locker tossed the ball into the air. Straight up, a "whoopee!" flip as he turned to be mobbed by his teammates in the end zone certainly the best moment in venerable Husky Stadium in five years.
Except that Locker's actions showed far too much college spirit. Or something.
Mostly, it was too much of a display of happiness on his part. Hey, the youngster has the right to be as happy as he feels not even the NCAA and Pac-10 game officials can control that. Yet, in college football it is not his right to express that joy in such a visual manner. It is, after all, an NCAA point of emphasis to reduce poor sportsmanship.
And we all know that tossing the ball up in the air so that it comes down and lands on your own head while your teammates are congratulating you is the latest version of the throat-slash gesture. It's akin to pretending to shoot your opponents with an invisible machine gun. Or staring into the TV camera and saying, "Your mama blankety-blankety-blank blanks in blank." Or something.
But referee Larry Farina was able to nip that nuevo-taunt right in the bud.
What's more, Locker's smile was clearly too wide. His teammates were congratulating him by pounding on his shoulder pads and helmet with so much force it was obviously beyond the bounds of good sportsmanship. And although none of his teammates left the sideline, they were yelling far too loudly. Any and all of those things could have been flagged under Rule 9, Section 2, Article 1 of the NCAA Football Rulebook "There shall be no unsportsmanlike conduct or any act that interferes with orderly game administration ..."
Fortunately for the good of the game, "throwing the ball high into the air" is spelled out nice and clear in Rule 9, Section 2, Article 1, Part B, Prohibited Act 2-A, and Farina insisted after the game that this wasn't even a judgment call. That he was bound by rule to throw the flag that would turn Washington's extra point into a 35-yard field goal (which was blocked).
This is exactly what the NCAA and all right-thinkers are hoping for this great sport, a laudable effort to remove some of this misplaced passion from the players. If the kids want so much to cheer and celebrate, they should go out for the cheerleading squad. Or something.
And this was the chance for all referees to stand tall and send a message to players: "Who do you think you are? We will not put up with this kind of behavior." Most referees, of course, would shrink from such a responsibility, and instead give players (and coaches) the kind of leeway that makes them think that their performance is what college football is all about. But to Farina, this is our game, and if we allow players to show this much spirit at any time, who knows what could happen next?
Bowl season roundup
![]() |
Bowl recaps and analysis:
-
EagleBank: Wake 29, Navy 19 | CFN
New Mexico: Colo. St. 40, Fresno St. 35
St. Petersburg: S. Florida 41, Memphis 14
Las Vegas: Arizona 31, BYU 21 | CFN
New Orleans: SMU 30, Troy 27 (OT) | CFN
Poinsettia: TCU 17, Boise St. 16 | CFN
Hawaii: Notre Dame 49, Hawaii 21 | CFN
Motor City: FAU 24, Cen. Mich. 21 | CFN
Meineke: W. Virginia 31, UNC 30 | CFN
Champs Sports: Fla. St. 42, Wis. 13 | CFN
Emerald: Cal 24, Miami 17 | CFN
Independence: La. Tech 17, NIU 10 | CFN
Papajohns.com: Rutgers 29, N.C. St. 23
Alamo: Mizzou 30, N'west. 23 (OT) | CFN
Humanitarian: Maryland 42, Nevada 35
Texas: Rice 38, W. Michigan 14
Holiday: Oregon 42, Oklahoma St. 31 | CFN
Armed Forces: Houston 34, Air Force 28
Sun: Oregon St. 3, Pittsburgh 0 | CFN
Music City: Vandy 16, BC 14 | CFN
Insight: Kansas 42, Minnesota 21
Chick-fil-A: LSU 38, Georgia Tech 3
Outback: Iowa 31, South Carolina 10 | CFN
Capital One: Georgia 24, MSU 12 | CFN
Gator: Nebraska 26, Clemson 21
Rose: USC 38, Penn St. 24 | Analysis
Orange: Va. Tech 20, Cincinnati 7
Cotton: Ole Miss 47, Texas Tech 34
Liberty: Kentucky 25, East Carolina 19
Sugar: Utah 31, Alabama 17
International: UConn 38, Buffalo 20
Fiesta: Texas 24, Ohio St. 21 | Analysis
GMAC: Tulsa 45, Ball St. 13
BCS title: Florida 24, Oklahoma 14
Photo gallery:
Shopping:
It's a slippery slope, of course. And that's why our man and his crew had to draw the line right there. Somebody had to show these young men and all others like them that a football stadium is no place for such overt spirit. Basically, if you can't conceal your joy any better than that, we'll help you. We can make sure you won't feel so happy for a while. You'll learn. Eventually.
This "reduced on-field spirit rule" is being emphasized in such a mature, reasonable manner this season that we might never have to worry about this topic ever again. And more of this punitive action by our game officials can enable these young men to learn to eliminate such exuberance.
Next, perhaps we can offer points on the scoreboard for best poker faces. Or something.
So, what else did Saturday teach us?
Just in case the Huskies hadn't shown enough ways to lose in 27 of their 38 games under Willingham, they found an almost unbelievable method this time ... having that penalty called with 2 seconds remaining, and then being forced to attempt a 35-yard field goal for the all-important tying extra point. BYU's Jan Jorgensen blocked it, and that was that. Despite the penalty, a team worthy of victory and overtime needs to score that extra point.
But that wouldn't have fit with the Huskies' pattern lately.
Stoops said a few days later he might pull his team out of future trips to Pac-10 schools (such as this week's game at Washington) because of the lousy officiating. At least Saturday's incident indicates that Pac-10 refs are not "homers" ... they're simply not very good.
No, I don't have anything against Ohio State, Auburn, Wisconsin, Arizona State or Texas, for that matter but they need to play at least one high-quality opponent or give ample evidence that they might actually be a juggernaut to warrant a Top 10 ranking at this point. For the Buckeyes and Badgers, that starts this week with games at USC and Fresno State. Next week, Auburn faces LSU and Arizona State takes on Georgia. Texas, for all intents and purposes, gets to keep fine-tuning for a month leading to the Oct. 11 showdown with Oklahoma.
- Ohio State at USC
- Kansas at South Florida
- Wisconsin at Fresno State
- UCLA at Brigham Young
- Oregon at Purdue
- Georgia at South Carolina
- California at Maryland
- Arkansas at Texas
- Georgia Tech at Virginia Tech
- Iowa State at Iowa
- And ... yes, Michigan at Notre Dame.
Member Comments
Bottom line is, is that it clearly states in the rule book that a player CANNOT throw the ball up in the air after scoring a touchdown. <br /><br />Get off the ref because he was obviously doing his job. It wasn't a "judgement" call. Locker was excited yes, but the fact was that he commited a penalty. <br /><br />If you don't like the call, change the rule
9/12/2008 8:44:00 AM(Report inappropriate content)
OU's tradition alone can beat the ducks. And yes I would love to see that game played again. We should schedule oregon as one of our cupcake games for the pre-season warm up.
SOONERS229/12/2008 0:09:00 AM(Report inappropriate content)
I can't wait until next week when some other team loses and it is all because the refs suck. Then maybe we can get on with the season... or at least quit having 900 articles and 50 zillion complaints about poor Washington and that evil ref who threw a flag... I have to see bye now, and go to hot black and white club "B l a c k W h i t e K i S S . c o m" where 11 beautiful big women are chatting with me now..
ImpertinentVixen9/11/2008 16:19:00 PM(Report inappropriate content)
goducks1111.....you're just uncorrigible. So why bother. I'm certain the Sooner faithful would welcome a chance to see OU kick your fowl football team's a**es around for 60 minutes. I look forward to our next game against Oregon. It don't matter where they play or who officiates. And I hope you're still ranked when that time comes.
awcomon9/11/2008 15:43:00 PM(Report inappropriate content)
Whatever Sooner22... your a whiner just like the rest of the Okie fans...I only wish I could see Oregon play Oklahoma this year so we could shut you guys up!
goducks11119/11/2008 13:29:00 PM(Report inappropriate content)
Rules are rules. I highly doubt that most of the players who get penalized in a game actually meant to commit the foul. Holdng, Pass Interferance and many other penalties could all be disputed as: "Well yeah he did it, but he didn't mean to." Locker was excited, I am sure that he is a good person and didn't mean to, but it is still against the rules. If people think that the rules should change, the flood gates will be opened to the potential of all rules being changed. Or, before a penalty can be inforced, all the officials must consult each other, an official in the booth the instant replay, and maybe a disinterested fourth party; but then we would have 7 hour games.
Coug819/11/2008 11:38:00 AM(Report inappropriate content)
I'm sick of hearing all the whining about a bad call. The Boogars blocked the kick. 35 yard kicks are a chip shot for college kickers. If Washington thinks they deserve the win then maybe they shouldn't have allowed over 400 yards passing. Or here's a thought; maybe they should have held Jorgensen again so he couldn't get the block, since the refs turned a blind eye to all the holding the UW offensive line was doing all game. GET OVER IT!
duggity9/11/2008 11:21:00 AM(Report inappropriate content)
Everybody talks about the unsportsmanlike conduct call on Locker, but what about all the calls that the refs blew to let Washington in to the end zone in the first place. Like the obvious holding call that should have been called against Washington that too is in the book. An offensive player cannot tackle a defensive player while the defensive player in the middle of trying to make a sack. How about the BYU fumble recovery that was changed to intentional grounding so Washington could hold on to the ball. The ball has to travel forward in order to be considered a forward pass if the ball travels backwards it becomes a lateral and intentional grounding cannot be called. On that play the Locker was in the grasp when he ?flicked? the ball downward and the ball landed even with the heel of Locker?s shoe meaning the ball had to have travelled backwards hence a lateral and a free ball as such intentional grounding should not have been called and BYU should been given possession of the ball. I find it interesting that the only time a call by the officials favored BYU in the game it?s considered a bad call but no one says anything about how the officials did everything to help Washington win the game throughout rest of the game. Not to mention that it degrades the superior performance needed by BYU to even block the extra point in the first place. <br />I say since no one likes the Pac10 officials anyway let just not schedule any more games in Pac10 stadiums that way no one has to worry about how the Pac10 refs call the game.
9/11/2008 11:12:00 AM(Report inappropriate content)
college football is for fun, pride, and a shot at a better future for these kids. when they celebrate a good play its all they have they aren't getting bonuses like the nfl let them celebrate as long as it is not unsportsman like or taunting. what is next for college ball will it be turned into the NFL (no fun league). let the kids play and have fun...
soonerbrad9/11/2008 7:36:00 AM(Report inappropriate content)
Ok there was a bad call. Get over it, im an OU fan and yeah there was a bad call way back when at oregon game but had we brought our A game, it wouldn't had even been a factor. They didn't belong on the same field as us or the same day, they should be playing on friday night instead of saturday.
SOONERS229/11/2008 4:29:00 AM(Report inappropriate content)
Jan Jorgenson's penetration on the attempted point-after would have meant the ball would have been blocked at any distance from the goal posts. The refs followed the rules with the flag. What upsets the UW fans is the inconsistency of it all. The homer PAC-10 officials had kept to a laissez-faire attitude the whole game (no holding calls, even when blatantly performed right in front of them?) and only decided to "call" the game on the next to last play. Lack of consistency would bother me too. However, the PAC-10 has its own rules about which officials will work its games, and you can bet it is self-serving. They just (finally) got involved a bit late in this game.
9/11/2008 1:28:00 AM(Report inappropriate content)
goducks1111, we ain't whinin', just statin' the facts. TWO bad calls on one play. It's done, let's move on. Now, come on down to Norman, bring your fowl football team and let's play some football. I don't live in OK, been there many times and seen enough to say "you got the wrong impression, boy"
awcomon9/10/2008 20:10:00 PM(Report inappropriate content)
I don't know about anyone else but I am sick of hearing Oklahoma fans and their coaches whining...what a bunch of B****es!!
goducks11119/10/2008 17:34:00 PM(Report inappropriate content)
And Weatherboy....<br /><br />YTake a basic law class. Every point of the law once contested before an adjudicating authority is a "judgement" call. The problem with the rule in this case is it leaves no wiggle room...it was very very clear. Locker violated it. Once you go down the slippery slope of picking when you want to enforce rules (if football and in life), you get into trouble. Suppose you think the law should be enforced at lunchtime when that drunk practically runs you over. You want enforcement....but later that evening it's you that got wasted and are driving home with a wiggle in your giddy-up. I dare say once those red lights are flashing in the rear vierw mirror, you want mercy. Good enforcement, good judgement on-the-spot doesn't care when the law is enforced. It's simply good to enforce it all the time and consistently for obvious reasons. If young men aren't learning that on the field, why play the game? You know this is true now don't you?
whitney649/10/2008 17:03:00 PM(Report inappropriate content)
0) Borst is correct. The Cougars have run 12 games now and although it is in no way close to much longer streaks by them and others, when you start winning more than about 10 in a row, you've accomplished a lot. BYU is an extremely good football team. Their defense is young, but they are also talented. I think you'll see them get much better on that side of the ball very quickly. If BYU keeps winning, I suspect they will rise quite high in both polls, maybe into the top 3-5 by the end of the year.
whitney649/10/2008 16:56:00 PM(Report inappropriate content)
1) The fan poll is irrelavent. The rule is what counts and wht was enforced by the official. If the officials decide to enforce rules anytime they want, then the game is far more tainted than if they call it as they see it.
whitney649/10/2008 16:53:00 PM(Report inappropriate content)
sooner 4 "u"...there are no hotels next to BYU's stadium hich holds 72,000<br /><br />the view is much better than flatlanders on OKI.....corn for miles
azcougar9/10/2008 14:43:00 PM(Report inappropriate content)
UW, that lost must have really hurt. I can't imagine your grief right now.... It must be great with all of the excuses you have to come up with! LMAO!<br />(is Schadenfreude a bad thing?)
9/10/2008 8:07:00 AM(Report inappropriate content)
It's a lot bigger than Boise St. stadium and they worked your OKIE ARSSES, GO HOME. Or did their lack of "tradition" not count. Your lame attitude is what drives the BCS machine. If we had the opportunity to play in a bowl game that paid our conference the kind of monopoly money you get for losing to Boise St., we could probably put in a few more seats for your alum's when they come to our house and get their azzes handed to them. BUT you won't come here to play, just to BEEATCH. Go back to the flat land jerky boy.
dirtysancheez9/10/2008 6:46:00 AM(Report inappropriate content)



advertisement

