West at his best for victorious Hornets
Game Time: Hornets 101, Spurs 79
2008 NBA Finals
Thursday's Game 1
Analysis
- Kriegel: Kobe needs to be like Mike
- Boeck: West revisits the rivalry
- Kahn: PG matchup could be key
- Goodman: Ainge focused on present
- Kahn: Phil, Red the ultimate rivals
- Rosen: Comparing historic Big Threes
- Whatifsports.com: Finals simulations
- Rosen: One of Jackson's best jobs
- Kriegel: Don't forget to credit Kupchak
Photos
- Finals pics: Game 2 | Game 1
- Celtics-Lakers through the years
Video
Also
Here are the quarterly breakdowns of the Spurs' mid- and long-range shooting:
First quarter: 7-for-18. Fortunately for the visitors, many of their makes were treys, so they managed to play the Hornets on virtually even terms.
Second quarter: 2-for-6. With Bruce Bowen, Manu Ginobili and Tony Parker able to get to the basket, the Spurs actually nursed a 3-point lead at halftime.
Third quarter: 2-for-12. Concurrent with New Orleans elevating its game at both ends of the court, the Spurs' feeble shooting proved fatal for the defending champs. This was when the game irrevocably turned in the Hornets' favor.
Fourth quarter: 4-for-11. Too little, too late. Also, two of the Spurs springers connected in garbage time and where therefore meaningless.
But the primary focus should be on the victorious Hornets, who made precious few mistakes and featured several heroes.
If the Hornets could do no wrong, did the Spurs do anything right?
Otherwise, Kurt Thomas looked slow and old. Michael Finley looked ancient. Fabricio Oberto couldn't take two steps on the defensive end without committing a foul.
Speaking of fouls.
This was certainly a hard-hitting contest with the Hornets achieving a much higher slugging percentage than the visiting Spurs.
Because their shots weren't falling, the Spurs concentrated on driving the ball to the hoop, yet they were awarded only 18 free throws (one of which was created by a deliberate ploy in the endgame so that Scott could get his scrubs into the game) compared to 33 by the Hornets. Despite both Duncan (one free throw) and Parker (five FTs) being routinely bumped, hacked and downright clobbered, the refs mostly sucked on their whistles until the Hornets had the ball.
It's called the home-court advantage.
(And by the way, the visiting team has the final say in positioning its players along the foul-lane when free throws are in the offing. Meaning that Joey Crawford erred in nailing both teams with delay-of-game warnings when the Hornets kept playing switcharoo in trying to match up Chandler with Duncan.)
In any event, the Spurs are now in a do-or-die situation. Can they come up with more between-game adjustments to contain West, to keep Paul (who hit only 1-of-4 jumpers) out of the lane and to match the Hornets' intensity?
And do the Hornets have enough of a killer-instinct to close the series and thereby avoid an anything-can-happen seventh game?
Not even The Shadow knows.



advertisement

