FOX Sports Video
go to MSN.com
  autos     money     sports     tech     more    
  MSN home  |  Mail  |  My MSN  | 

NFL Decision '08: Will Packers regret trading Favre?

by FOXSports.com


add this RSS blog print
Updated: August 24, 2008, 6:41 PM EDT

Pack did it their way


By Randy Hill
Special to FOXSports.com

Ted Thompson, who looks more like Sting's overworked stunt double than someone channeling Sinatra, is most definitely doing it his way.

Regrets, he'll have a few. But the general manager of the Green Bay Packers — officially allowing ego to sabotage his otherwise considerable roster-building skills — now has what he wants.

So, the first stop on this train of Brett Favre-related regret leaves us at the doorstep of a motivation that should be found in every NFL franchise. And that motivation is to win and win now. In the business of the NFL, worrying about the future only benefits the general manager and coach of the future.

Let's discard all of the mind-stabbing peripheral debris engineered by Favre to the point of screaming, national media frenzy, and zero in on what has transpired.

OK, the Packers, after marching all the way into overtime of last year's NFC championship game behind the best quarterback in the conference, believe they are better served by proceeding with an unproven quarterback who (unlike his unbreakable predecessor) happens to be injury prone. And the two backups currently working for Green Bay at the most important position in football are rookies.

Allow that to roll around in your head for a minute.

Now let's make a checklist. Would Favre's former teammates benefit more from having him re-enrolled at his old job?

Well, if winning is important to them, that answer is yes.

For similar reasons, the coaches certainly would benefit. Packer fans also really enjoy watching their team win, so they would benefit.

Thompson, Mark Murphy and the executive committee (gee, this thing might have gone a bit more smoothly with one owner presiding over these decisions) benefit if the team wins more now. And, if Favre had been unable to duplicate last season's success, Brett — for having forced his way back in — would be absorbing the most criticism.

As it stands, Thompson has put his job on the line by pledging allegiance to Aaron Rodgers, a quarterback with such an electric future that Ted burned a second-round draft pick on QB Brian Brohm. Maybe Ted just wanted a talented backup, huh? That doesn't fly; for QB insurance, you bring in a veteran on the cheap.

Anyway, who would Favre's return as a starter actually hurt?

The only person who comes to mind is Rodgers, who begins his run as the Packer QB wearing the biggest bulls-eye in NFL history. It would have been beyond tricky had Favre just remained in Mississippi without uttering a peep about returning. Check your NFL history. Unless the replacement quarterback is (Hall of Famer) Steve Young, teams that lose QBs bound for the Hall of Fame don't exactly do well.

But, according to recent mumbo-jumbo out of Green Bay, the Packers believe they can win more now with Rodgers, who handled the pressure of Favre's arrival by constantly missing the strike zone during the team's first intra-squad scrimmage.

Or perhaps they didn't have the guts to challenge the EA Sports Madden cover jinx.

VOTE! Packers will struggle without Favre

Stand by your man, Packer fans


By Peter Schrager
Special to FOXSports.com

I have an unflattering vision in my head — a morose blue-collar bar in Green Bay on a random October weeknight with a dusty jukebox in the back corner. The bar is packed with defeated, middle-aged Midwestern men sporting foam cheese wedges on their heads and faded No. 4 Favre jerseys on their backs. Once proud and dignified, they sulk in this poorly lit bar, heads bowed in a collective sorrow. Then comes a song from the jukebox — Sinead O'Connor's "Nothing Compares to You" or the BeeGee's "How Can You Mend a Broken Heart" — and all of patrons simultaneously link arms, shed tears, and sing every lyric while passing along a framed photo of "the ol' gunslinger." How can life go on without him? Wahhhh!

That's been the media's portrayal of the Green Bay fans for the past two months: "We're fans of Brett Favre. And oh yeah, the Packers too." And with every ESPN interview of the locals, the more that image transforms from gross exaggeration to potential reality.

Here's the deal, Green Bay fans. Favre's no longer a Packer. He's now an above-average 38-year-old quarterback with an alarming tendency to throw ill-advised passes playing for some fourth-tier team in the AFC. Meanwhile, you've got a 27-years-young former first-round pick at quarterback who has paid his dues, wants nothing more than to be the Packers starting QB, and is ready to compete.

Things aren't all doom and gloom, guys.

But here's the catch — Aaron Rodgers needs your support. I spoke with FOXSports.com's Alex Marvez in Green Bay this week, and he told me tales of Packer "fans" taunting Rodgers with comparisons to Joey Harrington while the kid's taking training camp snaps. Yahoo!'s Michael Silver shares an anecdote of a little kid telling Rodgers "You suck" as the QB jogs off the practice field.

In truth, Rodgers might suck. He might be the worst Packers QB since Randy Wright. But crying over spilled Favre isn't going to help. And there's a chance — yes, there really is — that Aaron Rodgers actually gives Green Bay a better chance to win in 2008 than ol' No. 4, himself.

The fact is the Packers were a 13-3 team last year that was an interception away (a horrible pass, mind you) from making the Super Bowl. Aside from Favre and reserve defensive lineman Corey Williams, the majority of the key players on that NFC North championship squad are back for another run. They're older, wiser and ready to repeat as division winners. Hell, whether it's Favre, Rodgers or Don "Magic Man" Majkowski taking snaps this season — Green Bay is going to be in OK shape heading into '08.

But guess what Packers fans? All this doom and gloom, all this fan negativity towards Rodgers during a Sunday night SCRIMMAGE, and all of this media attention and scrutiny can only hurt Green Bay. Blame management for letting the situation fester so deeply into the summer, or blame a thirty-headed cast of characters at ESPN following Favre's every breath like it was Watergate — but as long as you blame the new starting QB you will help crush your own Super Bowl hopes. Shrinks call it "self-sabotaging" behavior. And guess what Packerville? If you can somehow put those dreamy thoughts of No. 4 behind you for a bit, you may actually like what you see out of No. 12.

Sad songs may very well help heal broken hearts. But Pack fans, there's no need for such measures this season. Put those jukebox quarters away.

Because whether you believe it or not, your team is actually pretty darn good. Hell, they may be even better than they were last year. And absolutely no talk of retirement come February, either.

VOTE! Packers will be fine without Favre

Please note by clicking on "add a comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator.

Member Comments


Add your comment

 advertisement

FOX SPORTS NFL VIDEO

Glazer: Remembering McNair
FOXSports.com's Jay Glazer remembers the life of Steve McNair. The former NFL quarterback was found shot to death on July 4th.
Marvez: Buc-nasty
FOXSports.com's Alex Marvez on the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Hear why their frugal ways may not stop them from flourishing in the NFC South.

FOX SPORTS STORE

 advertisement

Statistical Information provided by: STATS LLC
© 2009 Fox Sports Interactive Media, LLC. All rights reserved.